J. v Canada Employment Insurance Commission

J. v Canada Employment Insurance Commission <Our office successfully defended that our client’s auto insurance payments for loss of income are not earnings> S.35(2)(d) of the Employment Insurance Regulations (EI Regulations) says that auto insurance payments for loss of income are earnings (in certain circumstances).Section 35(2)(d) is stated to be “notwithstanding” section 35(7)(b). Where a … Read More

<Our client’s review for the successfully resolved litigation against the Dominion of Canada General Insurance – Emo v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance> “Quality over quantity. That’s how I describe her professionalism. Ariel was referred to me by a friend. I could clearly attest that she was one of the top legal counsels I would … Read More

<Our client’s review for the successfully resolved litigation against the Belair Direct Insurance – B v. Belair Direct Insurance> I am truly grateful for your top-notch legal services and the recovery of compensation arising from my MVA impairments, which indeed has satisfied me. I really appreciate your legal services.

<Our client’s review for the successfully resolved litigation against the Curo Canada Insurance – C. v. Curo Canada Insurance> I truly thank you for having worked on my case tirelessly, which led to the satisfactory compensation from the Aviva General Insurance Company. The resolution of my accident benefits case with the Aviva was beyond my … Read More

<Our client’s review for the successfully resolved litigation against the Intact Insurance – M. v. Intact Insurance> Ariel is a fantastic! She fights for your rights and has your back throughout the entire process. I honestly could not have asked for more with Ariel. If you need anyone for legal services, look no further she … Read More

<Our Client’s Review – Wangyal v. Intact Insurance> “Hi, I am a client of the legal counsel – Ariel Baek – for the last 1 and half years. She is one of the best litigators that I have seen in my entire life so far. She is a very hardworking, consistent, polite and very positive … Read More

<Costs of examination for $20,765.25 including $19,000.00 for catastrophic determination assessments> Issue: “Is the claimant entitled to the costs of examination in the amount of $20,765.25 including $19,000.00 for catastrophic determination assessments, $1000.00 for transportation and $765.25 for interpretation services?” -1. Section 25(1)5 of the SABS stipulates that an insurer shall pay reasonable fees incurred by … Read More

<Denied chronic pain assessment and physiotherapy treatments Re-adjudicated and Overturned by the Insurance Company> 1. Our applicant’s office has met our onus successfully to prove that the two treatment plans for physiotherapy treatments and chronic pain assessment are reasonable and necessary. 2. Clinical notes and records from all treating doctors have been submitted as evidence … Read More

<Providing Notary Public Services for Ontario> Under s.3(1) of the Notaries Act, our Legal Services: (a) witness or certify, and attest, the execution of a document; (b) certify and attest a true copy of a document; (c) exercise the powers of a commissioner for taking affidavits in Ontario; and (d) exercise any other powers and … Read More

<QUALIFIED FOR Non-Earner Benefits after post-accident employment> 1. Applying the test set out in Heath v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 2009 ONCA 391, the Tribunal found that in the immediate post-accident period it cannot be said that the plaintiff “engaged in” most of her pre-accident homemaker and recreational activities. Pain prevented her from doing so. … Read More