Approved for specific area examination, panoramic radiograph, surgical removal of tooth #44, general anaesthesia and intravenous drug injection for a total amount of $2K.
The applicable test in convincing the Aviva was the “but for” test: whether the client would have had his dental issue but for the accident. We successfully proved on a balance of probabilities that but for the accident, the client’s tooth issue would not have occurred.
All medical documentation was used for backing up the client’s claim that his tooth issue was caused by the accident.
